Rofes argues that while groups and organizations that work
to raise awareness, give support, and make connections between the LGBTQ
community and the heterosexual community are positive. He calls for a more
radical movement that targets the source of the inequities. Liberal approaches
have to do with gradual shifts while radical approaches are more fundamental
and involve a massive transformation. I think that the groups that we discussed
in class that we’ve seen in our schools such as GSA are all liberal approaches.
Rofes also describes childhood as being very formative. He
explains how his childhood was somewhat traumatizing and how he believes made
him who he is as an adult. He explains how in order to avoid the traumatization
of children, they need to be given more rights. They need to not be treated as
property of their parents. He calls for young children to be able to vote. These
solutions that Rofes presents are examples of radical approaches, which challenges
the contemporary understanding of childhood.
My vision for the school I hope to be teaching in would be
very inclusive. I hope that the students of all ages realize both sexual and
other differences amongst them and embrace them and try to learn more about
each other instead of victimize each other. I hope that this school reflects a
change that occurred in our world as well. I think that if these inclusive
ideas that Rofes talks about begin in schools and sort of try to make up for
children who come from tough or “broken homes”, the world will follow in the
footsteps of the schools.
No comments:
Post a Comment