At Heights HS, I was in a 3rd level sign language
class, so there was little to no talking. The teacher communicated entirely by
sign language. It was extremely interesting to see because the teacher held
discussions about what seemed to be the politics of the 2016 election. I thought
it was really cool how they could communicate and discuss such meaningful and educated
topics solely through sign language and without words. I was extremely
impressed. In reference to Paulo Freire’s chapter “The Banking Concept of
Education” found in Educational
Foundations, I would like to ask if the sign language teacher struggles
with succumbing to the “banking concept” the Freire discusses. I feel like sign
language would be a lot of memorization of gestures and meanings, which could
lead to relying on the “banking concept”. However, from my observations of the
class during my visit, I would say that this particular teacher combats the “banking
concept”. In one way, he must use it to some extent to first teach the students
the basics of sign language, but the teacher was breaking away from it by using
the signs learned to have meaningful discussions in class. So, the teacher probably
did have to somewhat use the “banking concept” in the beginning to learn
foundational material, but he did not stop there. He took it a step further by
engaging students to use sign language to discuss issues and topics affecting
our world today, which I think is one of the points that Freire was trying to
make.
No comments:
Post a Comment